Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 03:13

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What will help me to get a bigger butt naturally?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Google Search Tests Audio Overview - Search Engine Roundtable
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Thank you.
How does someone start doing urban exploration?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?